A seed is being planted that ‘entitlement’ is a bad word,
and that entitlement programs are wasteful.
We’ve all seen the FB posts, “My [insert program name; Social
Security, Medicare, Veteran’s benefits] is NOT an entitlement. I EARNED this by [insert what you’ve paid, earned,
endured, or otherwise done to become entitled]! I’m all for ‘entitlement reform’, but leave my
[repeat entitlement program name] alone!”
The intention is more than obvious. It’s a ‘divide and conquer’ campaign. By convincing each interest group that their
program isn’t really an entitlement, they can gain support for cutting all the
rest. It’s actually rather elegant, if
you can overlook its immorality.
‘Entitlement’ is merely
a budgetary term for programs whose outlay is dependent upon the number of
people who qualify—for whatever reason—and are guarantee the benefit. There is no judgment or connotation associated
with it – except that which is being implanted in people’s little brains by the
spin-meisters.
No doubt if you lift of the dirty carpet corners of this nasty
misinformation campaign, you’ll find Frank Lunz’s droppings.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment